In which case did the Supreme Court rule that corporal punishment is not considered cruel and unusual punishment?

The Supreme Court ruling in the case related to corporal punishment being deemed not as cruel and unusual punishment comes from Ingraham v. Wright. In this case, the Court addressed the use of corporal punishment in public schools and determined that it did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling emphasized that corporal punishment has a historical precedent in American education and that its use, within certain limits, was not unconstitutional.

This decision reflects the Court's perspective on the nature of corporal punishment in an educational context, recognizing the authority of schools to maintain discipline and the appropriateness of certain disciplinary measures. The ruling also underscored that the Eighth Amendment was primarily intended to apply to criminal contexts rather than to schools, which operate under a different framework.

Other cases listed, such as New Jersey v. TLO and Vernonia School District v. Acton, address different issues involving student rights and privacy, specifically in relation to searches and drug testing. Similarly, Abington v. Schempp pertains to the separation of church and state in education and does not relate to corporal punishment. Thus, Ingraham v. Wright stands out as the pivotal case regarding corporal punishment in American schools.