What has been the trend regarding governmental immunity for schools in Nevada?

The trend regarding governmental immunity for schools in Nevada has indeed indicated that it has become less reliable for school districts. This is reflective of a broader shift in the legal landscape, where courts have increasingly scrutinized the application of governmental immunity. Specifically, there have been instances where schools have been held liable for negligence or wrongful acts that occurred within the scope of their operations, reflecting a move towards accountability for public entities, including educational institutions.

This change often arises from the belief that schools should be responsible for ensuring the safety and well-being of their students, which can sometimes conflict with traditional notions of absolute immunity. As a result, school districts may face greater legal challenges than in previous years, and their protections under governmental immunity are often not as robust as they once were.

The other options do not accurately depict the legal trends observed in Nevada. Strengthening of immunity would suggest a growing protection for schools, while the idea of absolute immunity would imply that they cannot be held liable at all, neither of which align with current legal practices. The complete elimination of immunity would indicate that schools have no protections whatsoever, which is not the case, as there still exist certain protections, even if they are less reliable than in the past.