What was the Supreme Court's ruling in Ingraham v Wright regarding corporal punishment in public schools?

The Supreme Court's ruling in Ingraham v. Wright established that corporal punishment in public schools is not unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, which addresses cruel and unusual punishment, and thus allows individual states to make their own laws regarding the practice. This decision means that states have the authority to either allow or prohibit corporal punishment based on their own legislative processes. The ruling recognized the rights of states to manage their educational policies without federal interference, thereby reinforcing the principle of states' rights in educational governance. As a result of this ruling, the legality and regulation of corporal punishment remain subject to state discretion, creating a varied landscape across the United States.